Arkansas Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 3,246
Swint v. Nile International et al
as 4:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Robert James Swint
Defendant:
Nile International, Neenah Paper, Sylvamo Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Maxwell v. White Hall School District et al
as 4:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Henry Maxwell, Jr
Defendant:
White Hall School District, Lyndzey Hegwood, Lindsey Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Jennings v. EEOC et al
as 5:2024cv05038
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jennings
Defendant:
EEOC, Fayetteville Police Department, Springdale Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jeffrey v. Salaam et al
as 4:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Brittany Dawn Jeffrey
Defendant:
Jalen Salaam and Zachary Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hawkins v. Yocum et al
as 2:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Detoniio Hawkins
Defendant:
Michael Yocum and John Dexter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Raper v. Arkansas, State of
as 4:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
James M Raper, Jr
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Logan v. Green et al
as 2:2024cv02018
Plaintiff:
Glicenia C. Logan
Defendant:
Vanessa Green, Attorney John Alford, Attorney Matthew R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maskell v. Ross
as 1:2024cv01005
Plaintiff:
Adam Maskell
Defendant:
Circuit Court Judge Quincey Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Marion County et al
as 4:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Marion County and Jim Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Fiorentino v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv05026
Plaintiff:
Shane Fiorentino and The Fool
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
