Arkansas Civil Rights Cases
Cases 171 - 180 of 6,739
Younis et al v. United States Department of State et al
as 4:2023cv01038
Plaintiff:
Ramiz Younis, Zain Ramiz Younis, Zaina Ramiz Younis and others
Defendant:
Atony Blinken, Lloyd Austin, United States Department of State and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Hunsucker v. Karren et al
as 5:2023cv05189
Plaintiff:
Heath Lee Hunsucker
Defendant:
Judge Brad Karren and Deputy Prosecutor Kelsey Six
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
McGhee v. Woodruff County Arkansas et al
as 3:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Joshua McGhee
Defendant:
Woodruff County Arkansas and Phil Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Stanley v. McDermott
as 4:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Marsha Stanley
Defendant:
Teresa McDermott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Forrest v. USA
as 2:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
Randy K Forrest
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Credence Resource Management, LLC
as 3:2023cv03045
Plaintiff:
Angela Williams
Defendant:
Credence Resource Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Sinclair v. Davis et al
as 3:2023cv00219
Plaintiff:
Dominique Sinclair
Defendant:
Anthony Tyrone Davis, Francis Washington, Scottish Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
