Arkansas Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 6,429
Williams v. Paragould, City of et al
as 3:2023cv00130
Plaintiff:
John Williams
Defendant:
Paragould, City of and Josh Agee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Virden et al v. Crawford County, Arkansas et al
as 2:2023cv02071
Plaintiff:
Rebecka Virden, Samantha Rowlett and Nina Prater
Defendant:
Crawford County, Arkansas, County Judge Chris Keith, Quorum Court Member Robert Kevin Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cross v. Cross et al
as 3:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Melissa Moody Cross
Defendant:
Katrina Richardson Cross, Does Human Society, Administrator of DHS and Randall Henley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ward v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2023cv00485
Plaintiff:
Valary K Ward
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Yell County, Perry County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Lee v. Pine Bluff School District et al
as 4:2023cv00486
Plaintiff:
Dexter Lee
Defendant:
Pine Bluff School District, Jeremy Owoh, Johnny Key and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Maskell v. Anderson
as 1:2023cv01046
Plaintiff:
Adam Maskell
Defendant:
Judge Bruce Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Maskell v. Harrod
as 1:2023cv01047
Plaintiff:
Adam Maskell
Defendant:
Prosecuting Attorney David Harrod
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maskell v. Hildreth
as 1:2023cv01048
Plaintiff:
Adam Maskell
Defendant:
Chief of Police Shaun Hildreth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Evridge v. Putnam
as 3:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Boyd Evridge
Defendant:
Kristi Putnam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
