Arkansas Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 6,746
Walls et al v. Sanders et al
as 4:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Ruthie Walls, Jennifer Reynolds and Chandra Williams Davis
Defendant:
Sarah Huckabee Sanders and Jacob Oliva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disability Act for Handicapped
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disability Act for Handicapped
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Hooks v. Reese et al
as 4:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Shayla Hooks doing business as Hooks Construction LLC
Defendant:
Ward Reese and Mary Beth Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. Patel et al
as 1:2024cv01019
Plaintiff:
Janice Oakley Johnson, Alfonzo Johnson and Fred Oakley
Defendant:
Darivyak Patel and Hitesh Patel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
