Arkansas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 13,534
Littleton v. Hudson et al
as 4:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Ricky James Littleton, Jr
Defendant:
Shirley Hudson, K Washington and Whittaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Joshua Terrell Bell
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willingham v. Dobbs et al
as 4:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Christopher Willingham
Defendant:
James Dobbs, Barbra Strom and Everrte Wilkerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunahue v. Jackson et al
as 4:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Reginald Dunahue
Defendant:
Moses Jackson, Dexter Payne, William Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elmore v. Hurst et al
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
Thomas Hurst, Claudia Harris and Higgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheets v. Mulvaney et al
as 5:2024cv05053
Plaintiff:
Aaron Michael Sheets
Defendant:
Corporal Tom Mulvaney, Corporal Corbin Brewer, Sergeant Joseph Malone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Cotten et al
as 4:2024cv04021
Plaintiff:
Jerome Edward Washington
Defendant:
Prosecuting Attorney David P. Cotten, Jason Mitchell, Warden Jeffie Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kidd v. Does
as 4:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Raymond Kidd
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. John Doe Staff Member
as 5:2024cv05052
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
John Doe Staff Member
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tavron v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Marques Tavron
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Mose Jackson, III, M Richarson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
