US District Court for the Central District of California Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,412
AMP Plus, Inc. v. Nora Lighting, Inc.
as 2:2024cv08460
Plaintiff:
AMP Plus, Inc. doing business as Elco Lighting
Defendant:
Nora Lighting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Hyperice, Inc. v. MerchSource, LLC
as 8:2024cv02092
Plaintiff:
Hyperice, Inc.
Defendant:
MerchSource, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Manehu Product Alliance LLC v. Monoprice, Inc.
as 8:2024cv02084
Plaintiff:
Manehu Product Alliance LLC d/b/a MantelMount
Defendant:
Monoprice, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Zugara, Inc. v. GoodR LLC
as 2:2024cv08133
Defendant:
GoodR LLC
Plaintiff:
Zugara, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
HYPER ICE, INC. v. THERABODY, INC.
as 8:2024cv02034
Defendant:
THERABODY, INC.
Plaintiff:
HYPER ICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Hyper Ice, Inc. v. MerchSource, LLC
as 8:2024cv02035
Plaintiff:
HYPER ICE, INC.
Defendant:
MERCHSOURCE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
TS-Optics Corporation v. Microsoft Corporation
as 8:2024cv01974
Plaintiff:
TS-OPTICS CORPORATION
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Trina Solar Co., Ltd. v. Jiangsu Runergy New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.
as 2:2024cv07694
Defendant:
Jiangsu Runergy New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Trina Solar Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
The Winsford Company, LLC v. Raspberry Med, Inc.
as 5:2024cv01932
Plaintiff:
The Winsford Company, LLC
Defendant:
Raspberry Med, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
IN 2 Developments LLC v. Globe Electric
as 2:2024cv07565
Defendant:
Globe Electric
Plaintiff:
IN 2 Developments LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
