US District Court for the Central District of California Social Security Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 17,766
Nikolay Arkhipov v. Martin O Malley
as 2:2024cv02204
Petitioner:
Nikolay Arkhipov and Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Bita Esfahbodi v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv02228
Plaintiff:
Bita Esfahbodi
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jason Coady v. Martin J. O'Malley
as 8:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
Jason Coady
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Zarina Azimov v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv02246
Plaintiff:
Zarina Azimov
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sean Reilly Myers v. Martin O'Malley
as 8:2024cv00568
Plaintiff:
Sean Reilly Myers
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Frank Enriquez v. Martin O Malley
as 2:2024cv02184
Petitioner:
Frank Enriquez and Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Shawn Lloydell Barrett v. Martin OMalley
as 8:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
Shawn Lloydell Barrett
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Joel Frederick Lang v. Martin O Malley
as 5:2024cv00564
Plaintiff:
Joel Frederick Lang
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gledy A. Davila v. Martin OMalley
as 2:2024cv02160
Plaintiff:
Gledy A. Davila
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Oscar A. Lopez v. Martin O Malley
as 2:2024cv02161
Plaintiff:
Oscar A. Lopez
Defendant:
Martin O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
