US District Court for the Central District of California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 37,474
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Frank Monaco Bazzo v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00635
Petitioner:
Frank Monaco Bazzo
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Glenn Arthur Smith Jr. v. Amy Boncher et al
as 2:2024cv02459
Petitioner:
Glenn Arthur Smith Jr.
Respondent:
Amy Boncher and Collete S. Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Kevin M. DeHoog v. Compton Sheriffs Train Division Body Cameras
as 8:2024cv00637
Plaintiff:
Kevin M DeHoog
Defendant:
Compton Sheriffs Train Division Body Cameras
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin M. DeHoog v. Theo Lacy
as 8:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
Kevin M DeHoog
Defendant:
Theo Lacy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antwann Davon Gutierrez v. Kevin Schick et al
as 8:2024cv00635
Plaintiff:
Antwann Davon Gutierrez
Defendant:
Kevin Schick, Don Barnes, Jeff Puckett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hung Duong Nguon v. James S. Hill
as 2:2024cv02561
Petitioner:
Hung Duong Nguon
Respondent:
James S. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anthony Gooden v. Tracy Johnson
as 2:2024cv02648
Petitioner:
Anthony Gooden
Respondent:
Tracy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02346
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
