US District Court for the Central District of California
Cases filed
Cases 11 - 20 of 227,751
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02911
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
and others
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02914
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02912
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02913
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans With Disabilities Act
Newsom v. Genesis FS Card Services, Inc.
as 5:2019cv00683
Plaintiff:
Keisha Newsom
Defendant:
Genesis FS Card Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv00713
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02922
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
and others
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans With Disabilities Act
CENTENNIAL BANK, an Arkandas state bank v. EFFRESS et al
as 2:2019cv02923
Plaintiff:
CENTENNIAL BANK, an Arkandas state bank
Defendant:
DAVID SCOTT EFFRESS, AURA, Hull No. BEYKK006E011, its engines, machinery, appurtenances, etc (the "Vessel") In Rem
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
Elijah Wesbrock v. United States of America, et al
as 2:2019cv02928
Plaintiff:
Elijah Wesbrock
Defendant:
United States of America, L J Milusnic, Lt Kittwilder
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00684
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Violation of Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
