US District Court for the Eastern District of California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,108
Castle v. USA
as 2:2024cv03115
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Christopher Castle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(HC) McClain v. USA (2255-2:19-cr-0165 WBS AC)
as 2:2024cv02935
Petitioner:
Dezmaighne McClain
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(HC) Bakare v. USA (2255 - 2:21-cr-00237-DAD)
as 2:2024cv02261
Petitioner:
Olamide Yusuf Bakare
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(HC)Guzman v. USA (2255-21-cr-00108-TLN-AC)
as 2:2024cv02065
Petitioner:
Marco Guzman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Corrales v. USA
as 1:2024cv00866
Petitioner:
Miguel Angel Corrales
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(HC) Kartan v. USA (2255- 2:16-cr-0217 MCE)
as 2:2024cv01926
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Satish Kartan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Daniel v. USA
as 2:2019cv00107
Petitioner:
Brant Q Daniel
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(HC) Cannon v. USA (2255- 1:22-cr-0119 KJM CKD)
as 1:2024cv00687
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Reginald Keith Cannon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(HC)Barai v. USA (2255-2:16-cr-00217)
as 2:2024cv01447
Petitioner:
Sharmistha Barai
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(HC) Saintillus v. USA (2255 - 2:20-cr-00213 KJM)
as 2:2024cv01308
Petitioner:
Chaloner Saintillus
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
