US District Court for the Eastern District of California Labor Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 103
Brehm v. nVent Thermal LLC
as 2:2019cv02259
Plaintiff:
Robert Daniel Brehm
Defendant:
nVent Thermall LLC and nVent Thermal LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nunez v. Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2019at00886
Plaintiff:
Roxanna Nunez
Defendant:
Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nunez v. Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2019cv01869
Plaintiff:
Roxanna Nunez
Defendant:
Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2019at00885
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lindsey v. Travelers Commercial Ins. Co. al
as 2:2019cv01855
Defendant:
Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America, Travelers Commercial Insurance Company and Peggy Stephens
Plaintiff:
Brent Lindsey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
v. Crane et al
as 1:2019at00430
Plaintiff:
Brian K. Crane
Defendant:
Joseph McClellan, Shea Meeks, Nam Van and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Crane v. Chevron North America Exploration and Production Company, et al
as 1:2019cv00805
Plaintiff:
Brian K. Crane
Defendant:
Joseph McClellan, Shea Meeks, Chevron North America Exploration and Production Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mendel v. Southern Mono Healthcare District
as 2:2019cv00216
Plaintiff:
Clayton Mendel
Defendant:
Southern Mono Healthcare District, Mark Lind and Southern Mono Healthcare District Doing business as Mammoth Hospital
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
v. Mendel et al
as 1:2019at00089
Defendant:
Southern Mono Healthcare District, Mark Lind and Clayton Mendel
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Gonzalez v. San Joaquin Regional Transit District
as 2:2018at01622
Plaintiff:
Ignacio Gonzalez, Jr.
Defendant:
San Joaquin Regional Transit District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.