US District Court for the Eastern District of California Labor Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 4,225
Coffman v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.
as 2:2023at01069
Plaintiff:
Jill H. Coffman
Defendant:
UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Todd v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2023at01066
Plaintiff:
Joshua Todd
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Heard v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2023at01065
Plaintiff:
Justin Aaron Heard
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Heard v. Ford Motor Co.
as 2:2023cv02397
Plaintiff:
Justin Aaron Heard
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Trustees on Behalf of Teamsters Benefit Trust v. Patterson Heavy Haul, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02393
Plaintiff:
Trustees on Behalf of Teamsters Benefit Trust
Defendant:
Patterson Heavy Haul, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Todd v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02398
Plaintiff:
Joshua Todd
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Nance v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02357
Plaintiff:
Tiffeny Nance
Defendant:
Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. and RYDER System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Heise v. Vision Service Plan
as 2:2023cv02334
Plaintiff:
Todd Heise
Defendant:
Vision Service Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Budd v. Vision Service Plan
as 2:2023cv02335
Plaintiff:
Brian Budd
Defendant:
Vision Service Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.