U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Contract Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 630
Karen L. Fox, IRA v. Springer et al
as 3:2022cv05343
Plaintiff:
Karen L. Fox, IRA
Defendant:
Daniel D Springer, Maggie Wilderotter, Blake J. Irving and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Williams v. Levchin et al
as 3:2022cv05300
Plaintiff:
Ron Williams
Defendant:
Max Levchin, Michael Linford, Jeremy Liew and others
Lehmann v. Netflix, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv05269
Plaintiff:
Mindy Lehmann
Defendant:
Netflix, Inc., Richard N. Barton, Rodolphe Belmer and others
IN RE WELLS FARGO & COMPANY HIRING PRACTICES DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
as 3:2022cv05173
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat and Charles Rogers
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company, a Delaware Corporation, Charles W. Scharf, Michael P. Santomassimo and others
Ormerod v. Barton et al
as 4:2022cv04700
Plaintiff:
Judith Ormerod
Defendant:
Richard Barton, Rodolphe Belmer, Mathias Dopfner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Stockholders Suits
Gennett v. Mercer et al
as 3:2022cv04450
Plaintiff:
Robert Gennett
Defendant:
Scott Mercer, Francois P. Chadwick, Christopher Wendel and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv04134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Stockholders Suits
Gervat v. Mercer et al
as 3:2022cv04036
Plaintiff:
Hughes Gervat
Defendant:
Scott Mercer, Volta, Inc., Francois P. Chadwick and others
Woodward v. Gormsen et al
as 3:2022cv03419
Plaintiff:
Brodie Woodward
Defendant:
Christian Gormsen, Joshua Makower, Douglas J. Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Heresniak v. Musk et al
as 3:2022cv03074
Plaintiff:
William Heresniak
Defendant:
Elon R Musk, Twitter, Inc., X Holdings I, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Stockholders Suits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
