US District Court for the Northern District of California Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 11,471
Actian Corporation v. EnOcean Inc., et al
as 4:2024cv01470
Plaintiff:
Actian Corporation
Defendant:
EnOcean GmbH, EnOcean Inc., EnOcean USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Patel v. Ikonix US LLC. et al
as 3:2024cv01498
Plaintiff:
Dinesh Patel
Defendant:
Ikonix US LLC. and Andrew Braverman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
ONan et al v. Databricks, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01451
Plaintiff:
Stewart ONan, Abdi Nazemian and Brian Keene
Defendant:
Databricks, Inc. and Mosaic ML, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Nazemian et al v. NVIDIA Corporation
as 3:2024cv01454
Plaintiff:
Abdi Nazemian, Brian Keene and Stewart ONan
Defendant:
NVIDIA Corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Martinez Ocasio v. Madronal Garrone
as 3:2024cv01442
Plaintiff:
Benito Antonio Martinez Ocasio
Defendant:
Eric Guillermo Madronal Garrone
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Zuma Press, Inc. v. ROKU, Inc.
as 5:2024cv01421
Plaintiff:
Zuma Press, Inc.
Defendant:
ROKU, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Eric et al v. Harnisch et al
as 3:2024cv01410
Plaintiff:
Lake Eric, Gam Athena and Emerging Beyond Films, LLC
Defendant:
Jonathan Harnisch and Roger Spillman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Strauss v. Superbloom Style LLC
as 5:2024cv01341
Plaintiff:
Myra Strauss
Defendant:
Superbloom Style LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
iQar Inc. v. Tesla, Inc.
as 4:2024cv01337
Plaintiff:
IQAR Inc. and Invently Automotive, Inc.
Defendant:
Tesla Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Oppenheimer v. Management
as 3:2024cv01325
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Oppenheimer
Defendant:
Gibson Portfolio Management
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
