U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,436
Cox v. King
as 3:2025cv01175
Plaintiff:
Christina Kay Cox
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Michelle King and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Dahmen v. King
as 3:2025cv01176
Plaintiff:
Paul Alan Dahmen
Defendant:
Michelle King and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Al-Hassan v. King
as 4:2025cv00988
Plaintiff:
Ruka N. Al-Hassan
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Michelle King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Devlin v. King
as 3:2025cv00848
Plaintiff:
Curtis Alcorn Devlin
Defendant:
Michelle King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hofmann v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2025cv00798
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Hofmann
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Arzadon v. Colvin
as 3:2025cv00714
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Villanueva Arzadon
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Muniz v. King
as 5:2025cv00695
Plaintiff:
Tina M. Muniz
Defendant:
Michelle King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Vallentyne v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2025cv00577
Plaintiff:
Isaac Xavier Vallentyne
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lanz v. Colvin
as 3:2025cv00503
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Carolyn Colvin and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Plaintiff:
James Phillip Lanz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Anderson v. Colvin
as 5:2024cv09503
Plaintiff:
Mark D. Anderson
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
