US District Court for the Northern District of California Other Statutes Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 2,275
Daro v. Embark Technology, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv03246
Plaintiff:
Andy Daro
Defendant:
Embark Technology, Inc., Elaine Chao, Patricia Chiodo and others
Tarlecky v. Embark Technology, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv03211
Plaintiff:
Karen Tarlecky
Defendant:
Embark Technology, Inc., Elaine Chao, Patricia Chiodo and others
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Ichioka
as 3:2023cv03095
Plaintiff:
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Defendant:
William Koo Ichioka
Collier v. First Republic Bank et al
as 3:2023cv03096
Plaintiff:
Hal Collier
Defendant:
First Republic Bank, James H. Herbert, II, Hafize Gaye Erkan and others
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ichioka
as 3:2023cv03093
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
William K Ichioka
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Alcorn v. First Republic Bank et al
as 3:2023cv03013
Plaintiff:
Roy H Alcorn
Defendant:
First Republic Bank, James H. Herbert, II, Hafize Gaye Erkan and others
Nyren v. SentinelOne, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv02982
Plaintiff:
Christopher Nyren
Defendant:
SentinelOne, Inc., Tomer Weingarten and David Bernhardt
Petitioner:
Amir Gupta
Petersen v. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. et al
as 3:2023cv02980
Plaintiff:
DEREK PETERSEN
Defendant:
TRIPLEPOINT VENTURE GROWTH BDC CORP., JAMES P LABE, CHRISTOPHER M MATHIEU and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Kusen v. Herbert, II et al
as 3:2023cv02940
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Kusen, McCadden Investments, LLC and Strategic Capital Investments, LLC
Defendant:
James H. Herbert, II, Hafize Gaye Erkan, Michael J. Roffler and others
Petitioner:
Rami E. Geffner, The Investor Group, Philippe D. Katz and others
Johansson v. SentinelOne, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv02786
Plaintiff:
Sakari Johansson
Defendant:
SentinelOne, Inc., Tomer Weingarten and David Bernhardt
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
