US District Court for the Northern District of California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,029
Vasquez v. Macomber
as 5:2023cv06109
Petitioner:
Rudy Vasquez
Respondent:
Jeff Macomber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Townsend
as 4:2023cv06102
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Gary Townsend
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Winters v. Sanchez et al
as 3:2023cv06093
Petitioner:
Paul L. Winters
Respondent:
Yesenia Sanchez and California Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Bonilla
as 4:2023cv06103
Petitioner:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Catarino v. Lynch
as 1:2023cv06064
Petitioner:
Edgar Catarino
Respondent:
Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nickell v. FCI Dublin Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2023cv06059
Petitioner:
Stella Maudine Nickell
Respondent:
FCI Dublin Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopez v. Broomfield
as 5:2023cv06017
Petitioner:
Gabriel Elena Lopez
Respondent:
Warden Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bernal v. Atchley
as 4:2023cv05933
Petitioner:
Ramon Hernandez Bernal
Respondent:
M. Atchley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Calderon v. The People of the State of California
as 5:2023cv05907
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Calderon
Respondent:
The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Haddock v. People
as 4:2023cv05857
Petitioner:
Donnell Gerede Haddock and Joesph Cuasina
Respondent:
People and Judge G. White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
