Northern District of California Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 7,327
Carrillo v. Placer County Superior Court
as 4:2015cv02285
Petitioner: Ray Carrillo
Respondent: Placer County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vongphachanh v. Muniz
as 3:2015cv02269
Petitioner: Johnny Vongphachanh
Respondent: William Muniz
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Sherman
as 5:2015cv02266
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harrison v. People of the State of California
as 3:2015cv02270
Petitioner: Jewel Harrison
Respondent: People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. People of California
as 3:2015cv02259
Petitioner: Richard D. Anderson
Respondent: People of California
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zavala v. Holland
as 3:2015cv02247
Petitioner: Mark Zavala
Respondent: Kim Holland
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ortiz-Calderon v. Holt et al
as 5:2015cv02238
Petitioner: Jose R. Ortiz-Calderon
Respondent: T. Holt, People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lankford v. Perry
as 5:2015cv02240
Petitioner: Desmen Lankford
Respondent: Suzanne M. Perry
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James D Fox v. Kim Holland
as 5:2015cv02134
Petitioner: James D. Fox
Respondent: Kim Holland
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Miller v. People of the State of California, Sacramento County We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv02120
Petitioner: Richard D. Miller, Jr.
Respondent: People of the State of California, Sacramento County
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.