US District Court for the Northern District of California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 27,001
Tamrat v. Singh et al
as 5:2024cv08591
Plaintiff:
Herman Tamrat
Defendant:
Theorodiris and H. Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. People of California
as 3:2024cv08416
Respondent:
People of California
Petitioner:
Patrick L. Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv08485
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv08495
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Koch v. County of Monterey et al
as 3:2024cv08415
Defendant:
Commander Phillips, Deputy Mendez, Deputy Pazozo and others
Plaintiff:
Mark F. Koch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bonilla v. Villarreal et al
as 4:2024cv08553
Defendant:
Lydia M. Villarreal, Timothy P. Roberts, Pamala Butler and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Volkman et al
as 4:2024cv08554
Defendant:
Timothy R. Volkman, John Gallagher and Judge Paul P. Burdeck
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Yabuno et al
as 4:2024cv08555
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Keith D. Davis, Judge Glenn Yabuno, Robert O'Farrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. Angie
as 4:2024cv08552
Defendant:
Angie
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon V. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv08421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
