California Other Statutes Cases

Other Statutory Actions Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 11 - 20 of 35,038
Daghaly v. Bloomingdales.com, LLC
as 3:2023cv00129
Plaintiff: Amanda Daghaly
Defendant: Bloomingdales.com, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Krick v. Barbaricum LLC
as 3:2023cv00124
Plaintiff: Jeremiah Krick
Defendant: Barbaricum LLC
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4311 Uniformed Service Employment or Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) - Discrimination
Cleanquest, LLC v. UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company et al
as 8:2023cv00148
Plaintiff: Cleanquest, LLC
Defendant: UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company, United HealthCare Services, Inc.,, United Behavioral Health and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Lapointe v. Barclays Bank Delaware
as 3:2023cv00131
Plaintiff: Janice Lapointe
Defendant: Barclays Bank Delaware
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
Tapia v. Comenity Bank
as 3:2023cv00135
Plaintiff: Irazema Tapia
Defendant: Comenity Bank
Davis v. Rockloans Marketplace, LLC
as 3:2023cv00134
Plaintiff: Tracy Davis
Defendant: Rockloans Marketplace, LLC doing business as Rocket Loans
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
Carlos Gonzalez v. Reborn Cabinets LLC
as 8:2023cv00146
Plaintiff: Carlos Gonzalez
Defendant: Reborn Cabinets LLC
Maritza Albaran v. TikTok Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00486
Defendant: TikTok Inc., Musical.Ly, Inc. and Bytedance Inc.
Plaintiff: Maritza Albaran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2510 Wire Interception
Tapia v. Lending Club Bank National Association
as 3:2023cv00120
Plaintiff: Irazema Tapia
Defendant: Lending Club Bank National Association
Carroll v. Recurrent Ventures Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00122
Plaintiff: Keith Carroll
Defendant: Recurrent Ventures Inc. a Delaware Corporation doing business as Outdoorlife.com and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?