California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 55,742
Frank Monaco Bazzo v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00635
Petitioner:
Frank Monaco Bazzo
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Glenn Arthur Smith Jr. v. Amy Boncher et al
as 2:2024cv02459
Petitioner:
Glenn Arthur Smith Jr.
Respondent:
Amy Boncher and Collete S. Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hung Duong Nguon v. James S. Hill
as 2:2024cv02561
Petitioner:
Hung Duong Nguon
Respondent:
James S. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anthony Gooden v. Tracy Johnson
as 2:2024cv02648
Petitioner:
Anthony Gooden
Respondent:
Tracy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Seau v. Pfeiffer et al
as 3:2024cv00572
Petitioner:
Roland I Seau
Respondent:
Christian Pfeiffer and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jimmie E. Stephens v. G. Matterson
as 2:2024cv02386
Petitioner:
Jimmie Stephens
Respondent:
Warden G. Matterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hildebrand v. Campbell
as 5:2024cv01791
Petitioner:
Michael Hildebrand
Respondent:
Trisha Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hung Duong Nguon v. James S. Hill et al
as 2:2024cv02297
Petitioner:
Hung Duong Nguon
Respondent:
James S Hill and Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Gibson v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00893
Petitioner:
Brittany Renee Gibson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duenas
as 1:2024at00232
Petitioner:
Gustavo Adolfo Duenas
Defendant:
Trent Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
