US District Court for the District of Colorado Contract Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 120
RE/MAX LLC v. RE/MAX Fidelity, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02159
Plaintiff:
RE/MAX LLC
Defendant:
RE/MAX Fidelity, Inc. and Michael Kebriaei
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Homewatch International, Inc. v. Navin
as 1:2016cv02143
Plaintiff:
Homewatch International, Inc.
Defendant:
Suzanne Navin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vasquez v. La Quinta Inns & Suites
as 1:2016cv01772
Plaintiff:
Vincent Vasquez
Defendant:
La Quinta Inns & Suites
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grease Monkey International, Inc. v. Barzo, S.A. de C.V. et al
as 1:2016cv00655
Plaintiff:
Grease Monkey International, Inc.
Defendant:
Barzo, S.A. de C.V. and Arturo Rodriguez Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armstrong v. Volkswagen Group of America
as 1:2016cv00071
Plaintiff:
Raymond H. Armstrong
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2310
Pak Mail Centers of America, Inc. v. Robinson et al
as 1:2016cv00029
Plaintiff:
Pak Mail Centers of America, Inc.
Defendant:
William Robinson and Gayle Abramson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Intelligent Office System, LLC, The v. Virtualink Canada, Ltd. et al
as 1:2015cv02724
Plaintiff:
Intelligent Office System, LLC, The
Defendant:
Virtualink Canada, Ltd. and Brian Monteith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Big O Tires LLC v. Grant Gunnell Enterprises #34 et al
as 1:2015cv02669
Plaintiff:
Big O Tires LLC
Defendant:
Grant Gunnell Enterprises #34, David Riesen and Michelle Riesen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mull v. Griswald International Inc
as 1:2015cv00737
Defendant:
Griswold International, LLC
Plaintiff:
John M Mull
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Khoja et al v. DPD SUB, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00258
Plaintiff:
Mehb Khoja and Rodolfo Guizar Reyes
Defendant:
DPD Sub, Inc. and DPI Sub, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
