US District Court for the District of Connecticut Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 186
Wasik et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00839
Defendant:
Ethicon, LLC, Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson Inc
Plaintiff:
Susan Wasik and Henry Wasik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bernardi et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00833
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bernardi and Ann Bernardi
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Danoff v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00816
Plaintiff:
Linda Danoff
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Linnon et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00596
Plaintiff:
Richard Linnon and Marlene Linnon
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Diblasi v. Smith & Nephew, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00566
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc. and Heraeus, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Frank Diblasi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Sostre v. Davol, Inc et al
as 3:2020cv00531
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C. R. Bard, Inc., Davol, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Debra Sostre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cannon et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00520
Plaintiff:
William Cannon and Susan Cannon
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maloney et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00515
Plaintiff:
Elaine Maloney and Dennis Maloney
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2020cv00414
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carter S. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Santos et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2020cv00407
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Margaret M Santos and Ronald Hoinsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
