US District Court for the District of Connecticut Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,953
Borrero v. Colen
as 3:2023cv01550
Plaintiff:
Christian Borrero
Defendant:
David Colen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Doherty et al
as 3:2023cv01542
Plaintiff:
Amauri Rodriguez
Defendant:
Daniel Doherty, Batten, F. Saleh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Godfrey-Hill v. Burns et al
as 3:2023cv01497
Plaintiff:
Errol Godfrey-Hill
Defendant:
Joy C. Burns and Jean Caplan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Quiros et al
as 3:2023cv01458
Plaintiff:
Luis Gonzalez
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Devonia Long, Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv01483
Plaintiff:
Jason Howard
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe and Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. N.H. County Jail et al
as 3:2023cv01469
Plaintiff:
Darnell Walker
Defendant:
N.H. County Jail, District Administrator, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Osborn Correctional Institution
as 3:2023cv01473
Plaintiff:
Keith Curry
Defendant:
Osborn Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marshall v. Zentek et al
as 3:2023cv01464
Plaintiff:
Aaron C. Marshall, Sr.
Defendant:
Christopher Zentek and Maureen Pratt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. UCONN Health et al
as 3:2023cv01465
Plaintiff:
Tyrrell Brown
Defendant:
UCONN Health Dept. of Otolaryngology, C.E.O., Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calhoun v. Uconn Health et al
as 3:2023cv01453
Plaintiff:
Christopher Calhoun
Defendant:
Uconn Health, Ersilda Ajce, Natalie J Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
