US District Court for the District of Connecticut Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,118
Walker v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv01933
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Scott Semple, Kevin Roy and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lovelace v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv01934
Defendant:
Kevin Roy, Sullivan, Gero and others
Plaintiff:
Devon Lovelace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strobert v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv01928
Defendant:
Carol Cepelak, Gero, Scott Semple and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Strobert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jumpp v. McKenzie et al
as 3:2024cv01931
Defendant:
McLaughlin, Turmel, AnJeannette McKenzie and others
Plaintiff:
Junior Jumpp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv01932
Defendant:
Connecticut Department of Corrections and Scott Semple
Plaintiff:
Curly Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Osborn Correctional Institution
as 3:2024cv01921
Defendant:
Osborn Correctional Institution
Plaintiff:
Neftali Soto Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Siwek v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv01923
Defendant:
Carol Cepelak, James Dzurenda, Scott Semple and others
Plaintiff:
James Siwek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vitti v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv01926
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Scott Semple, Gero and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Vitti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marino v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv01927
Defendant:
J. Dzurenda, C. Cepelak, Gero and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Marino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Papoosha et al
as 3:2024cv01929
Defendant:
Concepcion, Papoosha, Guadarama and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
