Connecticut Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 431
Max Blu Technologies, LLC v. Singulus Technologies, Inc.
as 3:2019cv01704
Defendant:
Singulus Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Max Blu Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
E. Mishan & Sons, Inc. v. As Seen On PC, Inc.
as 3:2019cv01602
Defendant:
As Seen On PC, Inc.
Plaintiff:
E. Mishan & Sons, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Arlington Industries, Inc. v. Hubbell Incorporated et al
as 3:2019cv01567
Defendant:
Hubbell Incorporated (Delaware) and Hubbell Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Arlington Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Brome Bird Care Inc. v. Classic Brands, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv01389
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Robert W. Donegan, Classic Brands, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Brome Bird Care Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
National Products Inc. v. Scanstrut Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv01322
Defendant:
Scanstrut Inc. and Scanstrut Ltd
Plaintiff:
National Products Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Wiremold Company v. ABB Installation Products, Inc.
as 3:2019cv01132
Defendant:
ABB Installation Products, Inc., ABB Installation Products Inc. and Thomas & Betts Corporation
Plaintiff:
The Wiremold Company and Wiremold Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
AlexSam, Inc. v. Aetna Inc.
as 3:2019cv01025
Plaintiff:
AlexSam, Inc.
Defendant:
Aetna Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Revolar Technology Inc. v. Wearsafe Labs LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00969
Defendant:
Wearsafe Labs LLC and Wearsafe Labs Holdings LLC
Plaintiff:
Revolar Technology Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Layla Sleep, Inc. v. Direct Supply, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00715
Defendant:
Direct Supply, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Layla Sleep, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
LILLEBaby, LLC v. Stokke, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00328
Plaintiff:
LILLEBaby, LLC
Defendant:
STOKKE, LLC and STOKKE, AS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
