Connecticut Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 436
Lander Enterprises, LLC v. Isonic, Inc.
as 3:2020cv01693
Defendant:
Isonic, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lander Enterprises, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Pactiv Evergreen Inc. v. Inline Plastics Corp.
as 3:2020cv01668
Defendant:
Inline Plastics Corp.
Plaintiff:
PACTIV EVERGREEN INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Dongtai Metal Goods Co., Ltd. v. Arturo Salice S.p.A.
as 3:2020cv01367
Plaintiff:
Dongtai Metal Goods Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
Arturo Salice S.p.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Arturo Salice S.p.A. v. Dongtai Metal Goods Co., Ltd.
as 3:2020cv00668
Plaintiff:
Arturo Salice S.p.A.
Defendant:
Dongtai Metal Goods Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Arthrodesis Technology LLC v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00285
Defendant:
Zimmer US, Inc. and Zimmer, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Arthrodesis Technology LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Max Blu Technologies, LLC v. Singulus Technologies, Inc.
as 3:2019cv01704
Defendant:
Singulus Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Max Blu Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
E. Mishan & Sons, Inc. v. As Seen On PC, Inc.
as 3:2019cv01602
Defendant:
As Seen On PC, Inc.
Plaintiff:
E. Mishan & Sons, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Arlington Industries, Inc. v. Hubbell Incorporated et al
as 3:2019cv01567
Defendant:
Hubbell Incorporated (Delaware) and Hubbell Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Arlington Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Brome Bird Care Inc. v. Classic Brands, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv01389
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Robert W. Donegan, Classic Brands, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Brome Bird Care Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
National Products Inc. v. Scanstrut Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv01322
Defendant:
Scanstrut Inc. and Scanstrut Ltd
Plaintiff:
National Products Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
