Connecticut Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,404
Dull v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00102
Petitioner:
Nathan G. Dull
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boyne v. Guadarama
as 3:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
Paul Boyne
Respondent:
Jesus Guadarama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Smith v. Stover
as 3:2024cv00064
Petitioner:
Branden Smith
Respondent:
R. Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Greenberg v. Federal Bureau of Prison et al
as 3:2024cv00035
Petitioner:
Julia Greenberg
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prison, Richard Stover, Grand Prairie Sentence Computation Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Giamo v. Stover
as 3:2024cv00028
Petitioner:
Michael Giamo
Respondent:
R. Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Samoiloff v. Stover
as 3:2023cv01698
Petitioner:
Alexa Samoiloff
Respondent:
Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Stroud v. Stover et al
as 3:2023cv01687
Petitioner:
Marcus Stroud
Respondent:
Stover and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Garcia v. Stover
as 3:2023cv01675
Petitioner:
Jose Oscar Garcia
Respondent:
R. Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Connerton v. United States Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2023cv01657
Petitioner:
Thomas J. Connerton
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Smith v. Stover
as 3:2023cv01645
Petitioner:
Brenda Ann Smith
Respondent:
Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
