US District Court for the District of Delaware Other Statutes Cases

Cases filed
Cases 91 - 100 of 5,203
Tang et al v. CITIC Capital Holdings Ltd. et al
as 1:2024cv00198
Plaintiff: JOHN YONG TANG and Faris Al Kooheji
Defendant: CITIC CAPITAL HOLDINGS LTD., CITIC Limited, CITIC Capital Partners LLC and others
Counter Defendant: GNC Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ballard v. Science 37 Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00200
Plaintiff: William Ballard
Defendant: Science 37 Holdings, Inc., David Coman, Robert Faulkner and others
SSE Parent, LP et al v. Haddad et al
as 1:2024cv00195
Plaintiff: SSE Parent, LP and Supply Sources Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant: Paul Haddad and Access Partners, Inc.
Jenkins v. Karuna Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00197
Plaintiff: Shannon Jenkins
Defendant: Karuna Therapeutics, Inc., Bill Meury, Laurie Olson and others
Miller v. Ambrx Biopharma, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00192
Plaintiff: Bruce Miller
Defendant: Ambrx Biopharma, Inc., Stephen Glover, Daniel O'Connor and others
Wright v. Harpoon Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00194
Plaintiff: Matthew Wright
Defendant: Harpoon Therapeutics, Inc., Joseph S. Bailes, Mark Chin and others
Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation v. AscellaHealth, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00189
Plaintiff: Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation
Defendant: AscellaHealth, LLC and DOES 1-20
Carroll v. Ambrx Biopharma, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00185
Plaintiff: John Carroll
Defendant: Ambrx Biopharma, Inc., Stephen Glover, Daniel O'Connor and others
Scott v. BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00186
Plaintiff: Christopher Scott
Defendant: BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc., Peter Cannito, Sean Battle and others
Tarpenning v. Peer Street, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00121
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?