US District Court for the District of Delaware
Cases 41 - 50 of 31,080
Scott v. Nelson
as 1:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Randy D. Scott
Defendant:
Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fedder v. Delaware Attorney Generals Office
as 1:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Fedder
Defendant:
Delaware Attorney Generals Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
AstraZeneca AB et al v. Laurus Labs Limited et al
as 1:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
AstraZeneca AB and AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
Defendant:
Laurus Labs Limited and Laurus Generics Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Fedder v. Kester et al
as 1:2024cv00462
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Fedder
Defendant:
Lewis Kester, Coplan Irena, Charles Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fedder v. Simpson
as 1:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Fedder
Defendant:
Charles Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fry v. Parker et al
as 1:2024cv00466
Petitioner:
Eric R. Fry
Respondent:
Phil Parker and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fry v. Hollingsworth et al
as 1:2024cv00468
Petitioner:
Eric R. Fry
Respondent:
Philip Parker and The Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
O'Neill v. ZeroFox Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
Shannon O'Neill
Defendant:
ZeroFox Holdings, Inc., James C. Foster, Todd P. Headley and others
Fry v. Parker et al
as 1:2024cv00467
Petitioner:
Eric R. Fry
Respondent:
Phil Parker and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
