Delaware Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 4,013
Epperson v. Peck et al
as 1:2024cv01199
Defendant:
Captain Coviello, Robert Heishman, Staff Lt. Stevenson and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Sidney Epperson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles v. Green et al
as 1:2024cv01185
Defendant:
Rachel, Hicks, Jacqueline Green and others
Plaintiff:
Harry Charles, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Emig et al
as 1:2024cv01167
Respondent:
Kathleen Jennings and Warden Emig
Petitioner:
Rashaun Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mallett v. Houser
as 1:2024cv01152
Plaintiff:
Christopher Nathaniel Mallett
Defendant:
Barbara Houser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roten v. Emig et al
as 1:2024cv01150
Plaintiff:
Ben Roten
Defendant:
Brian Emig, Kathleen Jennings and Jane/John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tate v. Green
as 1:2024cv01144
Plaintiff:
Giavon P. Tate
Defendant:
Dr. Jacqueline Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrison v. Johnson, et al.
as 1:2024cv01146
Defendant:
Julie Johnson, DET Holl, DET Abbott and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Garrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norwood v. Diaz et al
as 1:2024cv01141
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe, Stacie Hollis, Karina Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Norwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Savage v. Bee Bee Medical Center et al
as 1:2024cv01134
Defendant:
Bee Bee Medical Center and Dr. David Sopa
Plaintiff:
Tevon D. Savage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wak-Ikram v. Emig et al
as 1:2024cv01132
Petitioner:
Tahlal Wak-Ikram and Robert Potts
Respondent:
Kathleen Jennings and Brian Emig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
