US District Court for the District of Columbia Labor Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 54
REED v. PEPCO HOLDINGS, INC.
as 1:2017cv01357
Plaintiff:
PEPPER REED
Defendant:
POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
THOMPSON v. CHILDREN'S NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
as 1:2017cv01042
Defendant:
CHILDREN'S NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY E. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
STEWARD v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 1:2017cv00595
Plaintiff:
BEVERLY STEWARD
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC. and WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: Family Medical Leave Act of 1993
JACOBS v. NOT-FOR-PROFIT HOSPITAL CORPORATION
as 1:2017cv00391
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE JACOBS
Defendant:
NOT-FOR-PROFIT HOSPITAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Family Medical Leave Act of 1993
PAYNE v. BRITISH EMBASSY, WASHINGTON, DC
as 1:2017cv00297
Defendant:
BRITISH EMBASSY, WASHINGTON, DC
Plaintiff:
SHELAGH PAYNE
Cause Of Action: Family Medical Leave Act of 1993
WILLIAMS v. CHILDREN'S NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
as 1:2017cv00246
Plaintiff:
RISHANDA WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CHILDREN'S NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: Family Medical Leave Act of 1993
NDZERRE v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2017cv00090
Plaintiff:
HABAKUK NDZERRE
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HILL v. AVALERE HEALTH LLC
as 1:2016cv02490
Plaintiff:
MALAIKA HILL
Defendant:
AVALERE HEALTH LLC
Cause Of Action: Family Medical Leave Act of 1993
JBARI v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2016cv02247
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMED JBARI
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: Family Medical Leave Act of 1993
KELLY v. RICHARD WRIGHT PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL et al
as 1:2016cv01853
Plaintiff:
TORRAIN KELLY
Defendant:
RICHARD WRIGHT PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL and MARCO CLARK
Cause Of Action: Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
