District of Columbia Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 537
LATHAM v. GILL et al
as 1:2021cv03168
Plaintiff:
vanai y latham and VANAI LATHAM
Defendant:
JENNIFER M. GRANHOLM, john gill and sandra henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
DAVIS v. GRIMES
as 1:2021cv03075
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE DAVIS
Defendant:
MARK T. GRIMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JIBIKILAY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv03068
Plaintiff:
PRISCILLA JIBIKILAY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DILONE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv03015
Plaintiff:
FELIX DILONE and FELIX DILONE, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
BOLDEN v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2021cv03001
Plaintiff:
HAZEL BOLDEN
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BRIDWELL et al v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv02943
Plaintiff:
GRACE BRIDWELL, PHILIP COOPER and PHILLIP COOPER
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER, LLC and ERIC WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. BUTLER et al
as 1:2021cv02906
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Not Classified By Court:
US Secret Service Evidence Vault at 1100 L Street, NW, Washington, DC
Defendant:
DARIUS BUTLER and U.S. SECRET SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
LIRIANO v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv02836
Plaintiff:
YONY LIRIANO
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RAISER, LLC and AHMAD FARZAD TAHERI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCGOWAN v. AHERN
as 1:2021cv02505
Plaintiff:
Ryan McGowan
Defendant:
SHAWN AHERN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TYLER v. UNITED STATES ARMY et al
as 1:2021cv02494
Plaintiff:
THYRIS TYLER
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF ARMY, LUAN MAI and UNITED STATES ARMY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
