District of Columbia Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 477
ORZEL v. MAKAYAN
as 1:2021cv00022
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND ORZEL
Defendant:
SHERI LYNN MAKAYAN and TRAVELERS COMMERCIAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAMBERGER v. UNITED NATURAL FOODS INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00018
Plaintiff:
KAELA BAMBERGER
Defendant:
UNITED NATURAL FOODS INC. and TESHAWN COOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
APONTE v. PANFIL
as 1:2020cv03798
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA APONTE
Defendant:
EVAN J. PANFIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KORSAH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv03580
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN KORSAH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
ZELLARS v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2020cv03528
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Plaintiff:
NOCTURE NAYDENE ZELLARS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PAVCO v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv03451
Defendant:
CECILIA MIREYA CORDOVE DE PINEDA, CECILIA M. CORDOVA, RAISER-CA, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN PAVCO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JACKSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv03380
Plaintiff:
Mr. FRAZIER JACKSON and FRAZIER JACKSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY v. GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE NAVY NAVAL LITIGATION OFFICE et al
as 1:2020cv03305
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE NAVY NAVAL LITIGATION OFFICE and Katia Carty
Plaintiff:
GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY and GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
THEODORE v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv03211
Defendant:
RASIER-CA LLC, NIMA SABBAGHIAN, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
MARY J. THEODORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2020cv02951
Defendant:
RICARDO WILSON
Plaintiff:
Deidre Scurry and NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
