District of Columbia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 3,385
ALLEN v. STEIN et al
as 1:2025cv00751
Plaintiff:
DERRICK MIKE ALLEN, SR.
Defendant:
JOHN STEIN, ROBERT GUY, WAKE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. PUIG et al
as 1:2025cv00742
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LEE SMITH
Defendant:
JUAN CARLOS PUIG, KENNETH A. REDDEN, KRIS MAYES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
ALLEN v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2025cv00726
Plaintiff:
DERRICK MIKE ALLEN
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ROY COOPER, JOSH STEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STATE OF MISSOURI v. HOOKS
as 1:2025cv00718
Plaintiff:
STATE OF MISSOURI
Defendant:
BERNARD S. HOOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
HOLLAND v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2025cv00589
Plaintiff:
JUSTINA HOLLAND
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and BETH REESE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
PELLETIER v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2025cv00506
Plaintiff:
ROLAND PELLETIER
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOLIN v. MCDONOUGH
as 1:2025cv00515
Plaintiff:
PAUL C. BOLIN
Defendant:
DENIS MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2025cv00401
Plaintiff:
JANE JONES, AMY JONES, DONNA JONES and others
Defendant:
JAMES R. MCHENRY, III, WILLIAM LOTHROP and PAMELA J. BONDI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
PINTO v. VISCONTI
as 1:2025cv00293
Plaintiff:
ALBERT GREGORY PINTO
Defendant:
MAHA VISCONTI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
DOE et al v. MCHENRY et al
as 1:2025cv00286
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE, MARY DOE and SARA DOE
Defendant:
JAMES R. MCHENRY, III and WILLIAM LOTHROP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
