U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida Civil Rights Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 1,221
Wagner v. Aloma Bowling Center East Inc
as 6:2023cv01001
Plaintiff:
Tavia Wagner
Defendant:
Aloma Bowling Center East, Inc. doing business as Boardwalk Bowl
McNeil v. 729 Enterprises Inc et al
as 6:2023cv00995
Plaintiff:
Michael R. McNeil
Defendant:
729 Enterprises, Inc. and Dairy Queen of New Smyrna, Inc. doing business as Dairy Queen
Scharf v. Bitwarden, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00633
Plaintiff:
Chad Scharf
Defendant:
Bitwarden, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Summers v. Hyatt Corporation et al
as 6:2023cv00955
Plaintiff:
Maureena Summers
Defendant:
Hyatt Corporation, HYATT HOTELS OF FLORIDA INC., HYATT REGENCY d/b/a HYATT REGENCY ORLANDO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Ciavardone v. Raytheon Technologies Corporation
as 2:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
Laurellyn Ciavardone
Defendant:
Raytheon Technologies Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wagner v. Emily D. Metz Revocable Trust et al
as 6:2023cv00777
Plaintiff:
Tavia Wagner
Defendant:
Emily D. Metz, Mary Bryan L. Scrivner, Julian K. Dominick, Jr. and others
Wagner v. Versailles II, Inc et al
as 6:2023cv00776
Plaintiff:
Tavia Wagner
Defendant:
Versailles II, Inc, Big Brunos Bites, LLC doing business as Pizza Bruno and Versailles II, Inc.
McNeil v. Marian Real Estate, Inc. et al
as 6:2023cv00770
Plaintiff:
Michael R. McNeil
Defendant:
Marian Real Estate, Inc. and TRC Bar-B-Q, Inc. doing business as Dustin's BBQ
Wagner v. Circle K Stores Inc.
as 6:2023cv00772
Plaintiff:
Tavia Wagner
Defendant:
Circle K Stores Inc. doing business as Circle K Store #9756
McNeil v. Kinzey et al
as 6:2023cv00769
Plaintiff:
Michael R. McNeil
Defendant:
Randall B Kinzey, Harran Enterprises Inc doing business as Blackbeards Inn, Randall B. Kinzey and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
