U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida Civil Rights Cases

Other Civil Rights Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 31 - 40 of 3,392
BRADLEY v. CITY OF GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA et al
as 1:2025cv00133
Plaintiff: TERRELL BRADLEY
Defendant: CITY OF GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA, A C MILMAN, J C MEURER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BRITT v. BIDEN
as 1:2025cv00136
Plaintiff: FRANK BRETT
Defendant: JOE BIDEN, MERRICH GARLAND, HUNTER BIDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
DENNIS et al v. WARRICK et al
as 3:2025cv00661
Plaintiff: DREW CHANDLER DENNIS and COURTNEY SHANTEE DENNIS
Defendant: STEVEN WARRICK, JOE DELSIGNORE, TONYA DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PEPE v. WINESETT
as 3:2025cv00665
Plaintiff: THOMAS PEPE
Defendant: SHERRA WINESETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PEPE v. PIVACHEK We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2025cv00667
Plaintiff: THOMAS PEPE
Defendant: CYNTHIA PIVACHEK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PEPE v. LABODA
as 3:2025cv00666
Plaintiff: THOMAS PEPE
Defendant: ALANE C LABODA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MOORE v. CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH
as 3:2025cv00656
Plaintiff: BRADLEY WAYNE MOORE
Defendant: CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PEPE v. SHENKO
as 3:2025cv00644
Plaintiff: THOMAS PEPE
Defendant: JAMES R SHENKO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PEPE v. FULLER
as 3:2025cv00645
Plaintiff: THOMAS PEPE
Defendant: JOSEPH FULLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EDDINS v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
as 5:2025cv00112
Plaintiff: MARY KATE EDDINS
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?