US District Court for the Southern District of Florida Contract Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 478
Imperial Fund I, LLC v. Bim's Investments, LLC et al.
as 0:2021cv60162
Defendant:
Abimbola Orukotan and Bim's Investments, LLC
Plaintiff:
Imperial Fund I, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Imperial Fund I, LLC v. Orukotan
as 0:2021cv60160
Defendant:
Abimbola Orukotan
Plaintiff:
Imperial Fund I, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Centennial Bank v. Kane et al
as 0:2021cv60045
Defendant:
Evander Kane and San Jose Sharks, LLC
Plaintiff:
Centennial Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gypsy Mining, Inc. v. AmeriGas Propane, L.P.
as 9:2020cv82313
Defendant:
AmeriGas Propane, L.P.
Plaintiff:
Gypsy Mining, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gypsy Mining, Inc. v. AmeriGas Propane, L.P.
as 2:2020cv14456
Defendant:
AmeriGas Propane, L.P.
Plaintiff:
Gypsy Mining, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright v. GreenSky Management Company, LLC et al
as 0:2020cv62441
Defendant:
GreenSky, Inc., GreenSky Management Company, LLC, GreenSky, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Alexiss Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The University of Miami v. Viasys Healthcare Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv24692
Defendant:
Vyaire Medical, Inc., Bird Products Corporation and Viasys Healthcare Inc. doing business as Viasys Critical Care
Plaintiff:
The University of Miami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pease v. NCM WIRELESS, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv23965
Defendant:
ILAN DORON and NCM WIRELESS, INC.
Plaintiff:
Robert Pease
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Pease v. NCM Wireless, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv23966
Defendant:
Ilan Doron and NCM Wireless, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robert Pease
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CENTENNIAL BANK v. G&A Miami, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv23394
Defendant:
Haim Yehezkel, Abraham Kramer and G&A Miami, LLC
Plaintiff:
CENTENNIAL BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
