US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,723
EZELL v. FENNELL et al
as 5:2025cv00022
Defendant:
AUSTIN CRAIG FENNELL and DAMON OZELEK
Plaintiff:
KIRBY VAN EZELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BREWSTER v. NAIL et al
as 4:2025cv00019
Defendant:
MUSCOGEE COUNTY GEORGIA, MICHAEL NAIL, KIARA WASHINGTON and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE WALTER BREWSTER, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARVEY v. BRYANT et al
as 1:2025cv00011
Petitioner:
KENYOTTA B HARVEY
Respondent:
ERIC BRYANT and SUMTER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GUERRERO v. OFFICER
as 4:2025cv00017
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO HERNANDEZ GUERRERO
Defendant:
OFFICER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILES v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
as 5:2025cv00017
Plaintiff:
RODNEY JEROME MILES
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LYONS V. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2025cv00012
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Petitioner:
SCOTT LYONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCCRAY v. OFFICERS OF THE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT OF FITZGERALD GEORGIA et al
as 1:2025cv00007
Petitioner:
SERGIO VASEAN MCCRAY
Respondent:
OFFICERS OF THE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT OF FITZGERALD GEORGIA, BEN HILL COUNTY, CPT TILLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SWASO v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
as 4:2025cv00011
Plaintiff:
KYRON S SWASO
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORRIS v. CALDWELL et al
as 5:2025cv00014
Defendant:
KAREEM FULLER, Warden ANTOINE CALDWELL, DEPUTY WARDEN LACHESA SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID ZEKE MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
