US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,169
RIGGS v. STEWART et al
as 7:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
DANIEL EUGENE RIGGS
Defendant:
VICTORIA STEWART and JERMAINE WHITE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY JAIL et al
as 3:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
JAMES EARL HILL, JR
Defendant:
ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY JAIL and SHERIFF JOHN Q WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEMMON v. UNNAMED RESPONDENT
as 5:2023cv00468
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER COLLIN DEMMON
Respondent:
UNNAMED RESPONDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BURNETT v. UNNAMED RESPONDENT
as 3:2023cv00135
Petitioner:
KODY K BURNETT
Respondent:
UNNAMED RESPONDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DOVE v. MOORE et al
as 3:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
DOMINICK DOVE
Defendant:
SHERIFF MICHAEL MOORE and MADISON COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURTCH v. FRANKLIN COUNTY PROBATE COURT
as 3:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
CURTIS DEAN BURTCH, JR
Defendant:
FRANKLIN COUNTY PROBATE COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
THORNTON v. SMOKES et al
as 5:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
GEORGETTE BENITA THORNTON
Defendant:
OFFICER MS SMOKES, WARDEN MS FLOWERS, COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURKE v. SALES
as 5:2023cv00458
Petitioner:
WILLIAM BURKE
Defendant:
WARDEN TIMOTHY SALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GARDNER v. COWENA et al
as 5:2023cv00455
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY GARDNER
Defendant:
DR KENNETH COWENA and DEPUTY WARDEN L MCKENZIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
