US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 2,578
VEAL v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2023cv00366
Petitioner:
ERIC DEMETRIUS VEAL
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA and WILKINSON COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STYLES v. ODUM
as 7:2023cv00103
Petitioner:
DERRICK STYLES
Respondent:
WARDEN ROY ODUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SLATER v. WARDEN AT COASTAL
as 5:2023cv00347
Plaintiff:
JAMES MARK SLATER
Defendant:
WARDEN AT COASTAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MACK v. CARR
as 5:2023cv00342
Plaintiff:
STEVE MACK
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER CARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PHILLIPS v. PAULK
as 7:2023cv00101
Petitioner:
ERIC DEWAYNE PHILLIPS
Respondent:
ASHLEY PAULK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
OBEGINSKI v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 1:2023cv00154
Petitioner:
AARON OBEGINSKI
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOLDEN v. JESTER
as 5:2023cv00310
Petitioner:
BRANDON BOLDEN
Respondent:
WARDEN T JESTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LEE v. REED et al
as 5:2023cv00314
Petitioner:
JAI DEVON LEE
Respondent:
AMANDA REED, DONALD CONEWAY, SR and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PERSON v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2023cv00299
Petitioner:
EDWARD PERSON
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SISTRUNK v. COUNTRYMAN
as 4:2023cv00149
Petitioner:
TREVIS TYRELL SISTRUNK
Respondent:
Sheriff GREGORY COUNTRYMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
