Northern District of Georgia Intellectual Property Cases
Trademark Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 948
Evol Nutrition Associates, Inc. v. Supplement Center, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv01572
Plaintiff:
Evol Nutrition Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Supplement Center, LLC, Kenneth Affolter
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
Montlick & Associates, PC v. Exclusive Legal Marketing, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01355
Plaintiff:
Montlick & Associates, PC
Defendant:
Exclusive Legal Marketing, Inc. , Cody Bryant
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
Noorani Trading Inc. v. Bijani et al
as 1:2017cv01344
Plaintiff:
Noorani Trading Inc.
Defendant:
Amit F. Bijani , Nafisa Bijani , Danny Bijani
and others
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
Physician's Beauty Group, LLC v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2017cv01243
Plaintiff:
Physician's Beauty Group, LLC
Defendant:
Michael Sullivan, Rx Beauty Brands LLC
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Molnlycke Health Care US, LLC v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2017cv01238
Plaintiff:
Molnlycke Health Care US, LLC
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: a False representation-goods sold-interstate commer
Arcus Hunting, LLC v. Treelimb Products, LLC
as 1:2017cv01222
Plaintiff:
Arcus Hunting, LLC
Defendant:
Treelimb Products, LLC
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
BofI Federal Bank et al v. Portwood
as 4:2017cv00056
Plaintiff:
BofI Federal Bank , BofI Holding, Inc.
Defendant:
Lewis Troylynn Portwood
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
Tarsus Connect, LLC v. Trade Show Executive, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00849
Plaintiff:
Tarsus Connect, LLC
Defendant:
Trade Show Executive, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Invisible Fence, Inc. v. Petstop of North Georgia LLC
as 1:2017cv00793
Plaintiff:
Invisible Fence, Inc.
Defendant:
Petstop of North Georgia LLC
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
