US District Court for the District of Guam Contract Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 58
First Hawaiian Bank v. Pacific Composites, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00028
Defendant:
Christophear D. Young, Pacific Composites, Inc. and Amanda W.F. Young
Plaintiff:
First Hawaiian Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rahmani v. Longley
as 1:2018cv00011
Plaintiff:
Kia Rahmani
Defendant:
Charles Longley and Ellen Longley
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Dresser-Rand Company v. Guam Industrial Services, Inc. d/b/a/ Guam Shipyard et al
as 1:2018cv00006
Plaintiff:
Dresser-Rand Company
Defendant:
Guam Industrial Services, Inc. d/b/a/ Guam Shipyard , Mathews Pothen and Cynthia Pizarro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norton Lilly International, Inc. v. Park et al
as 1:2017cv00108
Plaintiff:
Norton Lilly International, Inc.
Defendant:
Chul Woo Park, Sun Young Choi Park, Jong Sung Park and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
First Insurance Company of Hawaii, Ltd. v. P and S Construction, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00091
Plaintiff:
First Insurance Company of Hawaii, Ltd.
Defendant:
P and S Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Dela Cruz v. Day by Day Store
as 1:2016cv00072
Plaintiff:
Jaydeen Catherine Dela Cruz
Defendant:
Day by Day Store
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dela Cruz v. Bank Of Hawaii
as 1:2016cv00073
Plaintiff:
Jaydeen Catherine Dela Cruz
Defendant:
Bank Of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dela Cruz v. D.O.A. Payroll for Government of Guam Employees
as 1:2016cv00067
Plaintiff:
Jaydeen Catherine Dela Cruz
Defendant:
D.O.A. Payroll for Government of Guam Employees
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dela Cruz v. Bank of Guam
as 1:2016cv00063
Plaintiff:
Jaydeen Catherine Dela Cruz
Defendant:
Bank Of Guam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dela Cruz v. Bank Of Guam
as 1:2016cv00064
Plaintiff:
Jaydeen Catherine Dela Cruz
Defendant:
Bank Of Guam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
