Guam Contract Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 101
Law Offices of Phillips and Bordallo v. Birn et al
as 1:2020cv00018
Respondent:
Edward M. Birn and Government Of Guam
Petitioner:
Law Offices of Phillips and Bordallo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Contrack Watts, Inc. v. Relyant Global, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00003
Defendant:
Sompo International Insurance and Relyant Global, LLC
Plaintiff:
United States for the Use and Benefit of Contrack Watts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Bruce v. Metlife, Inc. dba Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 1:2019cv00146
Defendant:
Metlife, Inc. dba Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Maria Corazon Albar
Plaintiff:
Nancy Bruce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Marks v. Hellmont et al
as 1:2019cv00142
Plaintiff:
Robert Jay Marks
Defendant:
Dr Deider Neuper, Lars Filip Hellmont and Dr. Deider Neuper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Habeck v. Ojets USA LLC
as 1:2019cv00099
Defendant:
Ojets USA LLC
Plaintiff:
Terry Habeck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States for the Use and Benefit of Tereas, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00043
Defendant:
Zurich American Insurance Company and Pernix Guam, LLC
Plaintiff:
United States for the Use and Benefit of Tereas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Propacific Builder Corp. v. Perma-Liner Industries, LLC
as 1:2018cv00041
Defendant:
Perma-Liner Industries, LLC
Plaintiff:
Propacific Builder Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
First Hawaiian Bank v. Office Creativity, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00033
Defendant:
Office Creativity, Inc. and Jesse S. Lujan
Plaintiff:
First Hawaiian Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
First Hawaiian Bank v. Pacific Composites, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00028
Defendant:
Christophear D. Young, Pacific Composites, Inc. and Amanda W.F. Young
Plaintiff:
First Hawaiian Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rahmani v. Longley
as 1:2018cv00011
Plaintiff:
Kia Rahmani
Defendant:
Charles Longley and Ellen Longley
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
