Hawaii Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 122
Arroyo v. Wetteland
as 1:2021cv00270
Plaintiff:
Maria Arroyo
Defendant:
Jennifer Wetteland, John Does 1-10, Jane Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ritchey et al v. Rando et al
as 1:2021cv00259
Defendant:
KASA Delivery, LLC, Bitesquad.com, LLC, Kristi Rando and others
Plaintiff:
Robert McPherson, Mary Ritchey and Robert P. McPherson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Branziel v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00110
Defendant:
Jian Wencong and Uber Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Marcelo Branziel
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Branzuel v. Jian et al
as 1:2021cv00111
Defendant:
Jian Wencong, Uber Technologies, Inc., Doe Governmental Entities 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Marcelo Branzuel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nahale v. Alamo Rent-A-Car
as 1:2021cv00081
Plaintiff:
Reina I Nahale and Reina I. Nahale
Defendant:
Alamo Rent-A-Car, Doe Governmental Entities 1-10, Doe Joint Ventures 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Granito v. Fattorosi
as 1:2021cv00027
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance Company, Doe Governmental Entities 1-10, Doe Partnership 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Dino Kaipo Granito
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
New v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv00557
Plaintiff:
Celena L. New
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Corpuz v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv00169
Plaintiff:
RAYNALYN D CORPUZ and Raynalyn D. Corpuz
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Min v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2020cv00039
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Jane Does 1-10, John Does 2-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel C. Min
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Estabrook v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv00025
Plaintiff:
Steven Estabrook
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
