Hawaii Civil Rights Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 103
Galarza et al v. Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00111
Plaintiff:
Steven Galarza and Beverly Galarza
Defendant:
Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
AOAO Liliuokalani Gardens at Waikiki v. Taylor
as 1:2011cv00751
Plaintiff:
AOAO Liliuokalani Gardens at Waikiki
Defendant:
Joel Lee Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
McKinley et al v. Wilson et al
as 1:2011cv00640
Plaintiff:
Jason McKinley and Case McKinley
Defendant:
Allen Wilson, Hawaiiana Management Company Ltd., Kuilima Estates West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Telluselle v. Hawaii Pacific University et al
as 1:2011cv00343
Plaintiff:
C. Alexandra Telluselle
Defendant:
Hawaii Pacific University and Erleina Danao
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jura v. County of Maui et al
as 1:2011cv00338
Plaintiff:
Jacki Jura
Defendant:
County of Maui, Benjamin M. Acob and Marie J. Kosgarten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Shim v. United Airlines, Inc.
as 1:2011cv00162
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Shim
Defendant:
United Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
R. et al v. State of Hawaii, Department of Education
as 1:2010cv00373
Plaintiff:
Gannon R. , Erin R. and Brendon R.
Defendant:
State of Hawaii, Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
M. et al v. Department of Education, State of Hawai'i
as 1:2010cv00369
Plaintiff:
Sherry M. and James M.
Defendant:
Department of Education, State of Hawai'i
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Rivas-Parker v. Attractions Hawaii
as 1:2010cv00164
Plaintiff:
Karla Rivas-Parker
Defendant:
Attractions Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Violation of Americans with Disabilities Act
Shaughnessy v. SCY Corporation
as 1:2010cv00035
Plaintiff:
Brian Shaughnessy
Defendant:
SCY Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Violation of Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
