US District Court for the District of Idaho Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 997
Carpentier v. State of Idaho
as 1:2023cv00535
Petitioner:
Alfred L. Carpentier
Respondent:
State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Milton v. Valley
as 1:2023cv00520
Plaintiff:
Bishop Patrick Michael Milton
Defendant:
Randy Valley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilkins v. Clifford, et al.
as 1:2023cv00523
Petitioner:
Robert Wilkins
Respondent:
Ada County Sheriff Matthew Clifford, Attorney General Raul R. Labrador and Steve Wolfson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Anderson v. Valley et al
as 1:2023cv00500
Petitioner:
Devon Joseph Anderson
Respondent:
Randy Valley and Raul Labrador
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ullom v. Armstrong
as 2:2023cv00473
Petitioner:
Terry Glen Ullom
Respondent:
Glen Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ohrt v. Valley
as 2:2023cv00469
Plaintiff:
Randall William Ohrt
Defendant:
Randy Valley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wooden v. Barlow-Hust
as 1:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
Vaughen Maurice Wooden
Defendant:
Noel Barlow-Hust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilkins v. State of Idaho
as 1:2023cv00446
Petitioner:
Robert Emanuel Wilkins, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
March v. Clement
as 4:2023cv00370
Petitioner:
Francis Marie March
Respondent:
Janelle Clement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Valley, et al.
as 1:2023cv00362
Petitioner:
Jeffery E. Martin
Respondent:
Warden Randy Valley and Idaho State Commission of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
