U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,064
Solorio v. Ross et al
as 1:2025cv00288
Petitioner:
Ash Justin Solorio
Respondent:
Ross, Jason D. Scott, Parol Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hughes v. Director
as 1:2025cv00256
Plaintiff:
Otis James Hughes
Defendant:
Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Willingham v. Davis
as 1:2025cv00252
Petitioner:
Chad L. Willingham
Respondent:
I.S.C.I. Warden Ty Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCoy v. Idaho Commission of Pardons and Parole et al
as 1:2025cv00255
Plaintiff:
Garrett Michael McCoy
Defendant:
Idaho Commission of Pardons and Parole, Matt Clifford and Raul R. Labrador
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Warren v. State of Idaho
as 1:2025cv00196
Petitioner:
Thomas Warren
Respondent:
State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Warren v. State of Idaho
as 1:2025cv00197
Petitioner:
Thomas Warren
Respondent:
State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Ross
as 1:2025cv00185
Petitioner:
Devon Joseph Anderson
Respondent:
Russell Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dixon v. B.O.P.
as 2:2025cv00169
Petitioner:
Daniel Lee Dixon
Respondent:
B.O.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
McCoy v. Tewalt
as 1:2025cv00158
Petitioner:
Garrett McCoy
Respondent:
Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wheeler v. Petty, et al.,
as 1:2025cv00135
Petitioner:
Bradley Wheeler
Respondent:
Petty, Brad Little, Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
