District of Idaho Prisoner Petitions Cases
General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 702
Durette v. Warden
as 2:2016cv00412
Petitioner:
Timothy C Durette
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Winn v. Blades
as 1:2016cv00390
Petitioner:
Melvin Winn
Respondent:
Randy Blades
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCabe v. Blades
as 1:2016cv00381
Petitioner:
Melvin A. McCabe
Respondent:
Randy Blades
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hayes v. Page
as 1:2016cv00386
Petitioner:
Michael Thomas Hayes
Respondent:
Chad Page
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turner v. Philbin
as 1:2016cv00382
Petitioner:
Denorris Turner
Respondent:
Edward Philbin
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shirley v. The State of Idaho et al
as 1:2016cv00377
Petitioner:
Charles Ellis Shirley
Respondent:
State of Idaho, Ada County Prosecutor
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clyne v. Greenwood et al
as 1:2016cv00363
Petitioner:
Heath Thomas Clyne
Respondent:
Greenwood, Voght
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanders v. District Court of the Sixth Judicial District of the State of Idaho
as 4:2016cv00360
Petitioner:
Derek Jon Sanders
Respondent:
District Court of the Sixth Judical District of the State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanders v. Idaho Department of Correction et al
as 1:2016cv00349
Petitioner:
Robert W Sanders
Respondent:
Idaho Department of Correction, Blades
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conerly v. United States of America et al
as 1:2016cv00351
Petitioner:
Detrick Curtis Conerly
Respondent:
United States of America, State of Idaho, Ada County
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.