Idaho Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,024
McCoy v. County of Ada et al
as 1:2024cv00449
Respondent:
Ada Administraters Office, Ada County Jail, Ada County Courthouse and others
Petitioner:
Garrett M McCoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCoy v. Clifford, et al.
as 1:2024cv00432
Respondent:
Shareholders, Matthew Clifford and Subordinate Officer's
Petitioner:
Garrett Michael McCoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Ross
as 1:2024cv00433
Respondent:
Russels Ross
Petitioner:
Steven L. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vallotten v. Donahue, et al.
as 1:2024cv00406
Respondent:
Kieran Donahue and Raul R. Labrador
Petitioner:
Tommy Vallotten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marsalis v. Tewalt
as 1:2024cv00403
Respondent:
Josh Tewalt
Petitioner:
Jeffrey J. Marsalis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Musgrove v. Parole Board Commission of Idaho et al
as 1:2024cv00394
Defendant:
Millisa Windrow, Raul Labrador, Shelley W. Armstrong and others
Petitioner:
Theodore E Musgrove
Respondent:
Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Douglas v. Davis
as 1:2024cv00391
Respondent:
Tyrell Davis
Petitioner:
John C. Douglas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charboneau v. Davis
as 1:2024cv00390
Respondent:
Tyrel Davis
Petitioner:
Jaime Dean Charboneau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gioia v. Bradshaw
as 1:2024cv00380
Respondent:
Rick Bradshaw
Petitioner:
Michael Patrick Gioia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gioia v. Lewis
as 1:2024cv00386
Respondent:
Diana Lewis
Petitioner:
Michael Patrick Gioia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
