Idaho Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 955
Jackson v. Twin Falls, Idaho District Courts et al
as 1:2022cv00345
Petitioner: Michael E Jackson
Respondent: Twin Falls, Idaho District Courts, Twin Falls County Jail and Ivy Medical
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Reynolds v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv00342
Petitioner: Ray Reynolds
Respondent: Merrick Garland and Randy Valley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Ivy Medical, et al.
as 1:2022cv00325
Plaintiff: Michael E. Jackson
Defendant: Ivy Medical, Judicial Courts and Twin Falls County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. The Unsaid Arresting Officer, et al.
as 1:2022cv00319
Plaintiff: Alan Dale Smith
Defendant: The Unsaid Arresting Officer and Jonathon David Loschi
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2254 Civil Forfeiture
Apple v. Officer Chris Young et al
as 1:2022cv00309
Petitioner: Brandon Apple
Respondent: Officer Chris Young and Public Defender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Snyder v. Ramirez
as 1:2022cv00311
Petitioner: James Snyder
Respondent: Al Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hoffman v. Rule
as 4:2022cv00290
Petitioner: Monte Hoffman
Respondent: Warden Rule
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hoffman v. Rule
as 1:2022cv00278
Petitioner: Monte G Hoffman
Respondent: Warden Rule
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
McCoy v. Tewalt
as 1:2022cv00267
Petitioner: Matthew McCoy
Respondent: Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shunn v. Davis, et al.
as 1:2022cv00258
Plaintiff: Forrest Glenn Shunn
Defendant: Davis and Wesseler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?