US District Court for the Central District of Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 4,737
Mullen v. Easton
as 1:2022cv01161
Plaintiff:
Noah Mullen
Defendant:
Trevor Easton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harms v. Tazewell County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2022cv01159
Plaintiff:
Barry Harms
Defendant:
Tazewell County Sheriff's Office, Kellen Williams, Brittany Wertz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estate of Jaimeson Cody et al v. Sangamon County et al
as 3:2022cv03065
Plaintiff:
Estate of Jaimeson Cody and Daniel Cody
Defendant:
Sangamon County, Andrew Van Meter, Jack Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rowe v. Warren et al
as 1:2022cv01149
Plaintiff:
Aaron Rowe
Defendant:
. Warren and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Custer v. Lyons et al
as 1:2022cv01147
Plaintiff:
John Custer
Defendant:
Kevin Lyons, Jodi Hoos, Debroh Shelby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poulin v. Waite
as 2:2022cv02092
Plaintiff:
Matthew R Poulin
Defendant:
Alisha Waite
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hayes v. Plaza et al
as 3:2022cv03064
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Hayes
Defendant:
Regan Plaza and . Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Townsend v. Jacobs et al
as 3:2022cv03059
Plaintiff:
Robert Townsend
Defendant:
Tanner K. Jacobs, Sarah E. Seberger, Mr Douglas J Quivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockett-Nesbitt v. Clayton et al
as 3:2022cv03063
Plaintiff:
Chase Lockett-Nesbitt
Defendant:
Skip Clayton and Brady Knox LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
People of the State of Illinois v. Burnside
as 1:2022cv01131
Defendant:
Brian A Burnside and El Unus Per Solem Bey
Plaintiff:
People of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
