US District Court for the Central District of Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,348
Echols v. Nurse et al
as 1:2024cv01489
Defendant:
. Doolin, Katina Jordan, Mindi Nurse and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Echols, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. William
as 1:2024cv01490
Defendant:
James William
Plaintiff:
Henry Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Smith v. Brown
as 1:2024cv01491
Plaintiff:
Henry Smith
Defendant:
J Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bell v. Bridwell et al
as 2:2024cv02280
Defendant:
Lawrence Correctional Center and . Bridwell
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guetta v. Duncan et al
as 2:2024cv02277
Defendant:
Decatur Correctional Center and George Duncan
Plaintiff:
Crystal Guetta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyehimba v. Kozak et al
as 3:2024cv03341
Defendant:
Steven Campbell, . Deal, . Armstrong and others
Plaintiff:
Niameh Tyehimba
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bishop v. Adkins et al
as 2:2024cv02276
Defendant:
Jamie Lee Hume, Felicia Adkins and OSF Healthcare Saint Francis Medical Center
Plaintiff:
Bartholomew Bishop
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nolden v. Arogundade et al
as 3:2024cv03338
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Stepfaie Howard, Yemisi Arogundade and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Nolden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Nurse et al
as 1:2024cv01488
Defendant:
. Sabrina, Nikki Rambo, . Ashley and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse James, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mrdjenovich v. Fryrear et al
as 4:2024cv04226
Defendant:
. Maine, . Adams, . Gibson and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mrdjenovich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
