U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Contract Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 9,807
Langone v. Gantz
as 1:2025cv00209
Defendant:
William Gantz
Plaintiff:
Christopher V Langone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
A.M. Castle & Co. v. RemArms LLC.
as 1:2025cv00219
Plaintiff:
A.M. Castle & Co. and RemArms LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Live Life Federal Credit Union v. Virtual Asset, LLC
as 1:2025cv00172
Plaintiff:
Live Life Federal Credit Union
Defendant:
Virtual Asset, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
QuaXigma Inc. v. Texcido LLC
as 1:2025cv00015
Plaintiff:
QuaXigma Inc.
Defendant:
Texcido LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Marshall v. Braun
as 1:2025cv00039
Defendant:
Chelsea C. Braun
Plaintiff:
Aaron R. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Shekarchi LTD et al
as 1:2024cv13317
Plaintiff:
Shekarchi LTD and Mid Valley Nut Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
AC Carrier Technologies Inc. v. Heroshe Inc.
as 1:2024cv13346
Defendant:
Heroshe Inc.
Plaintiff:
AC Carrier Technologies Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Beeson et al v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2024cv13348
Defendant:
Adam G Brief, MERRICK B GARLAND and Tara Twomey
Plaintiff:
Thomas Beeson and Donna Beeson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hall et al v. Hoiness et al
as 3:2024cv50529
Defendant:
Sally Butler, Roland Hall, Richard Hall and others
Plaintiff:
Randall C Hall and Rosemary Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Hall v. Hoiness et al
as 3:2024cv50530
Defendant:
Sally Butler, Sarah Hall, Roland Hall and others
Plaintiff:
Randall C Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.