US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,813
Clark v. WalMart, Inc.
as 1:2024cv12751
Defendant:
WalMart, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Katrina Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Carroll v. LCA-Vision, Inc. d/b/a LasikPlus
as 1:2024cv12691
Plaintiff:
Artisha Carroll
Defendant:
LCA-Vision, Inc. d/b/a LasikPlus
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2518 Interception of Wire/Oral/Electronic Communication
Soto v. Gene by Gene, Ltd. d/b/a FamilyTreeDNA
as 1:2024cv12700
Defendant:
Gene by Gene, Ltd. d/b/a FamilyTreeDNA
Plaintiff:
Ramon Soto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Shankar v. Adyen NV
as 1:2024cv12708
Defendant:
Adyen NV
Plaintiff:
Raghavendran Shankar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Dinelli v. Menard, Inc
as 1:2024cv12623
Plaintiff:
Ryan J Dinelli
Defendant:
Menard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Flake v. Sonesta Walton Place LLC et al
as 1:2024cv12647
Plaintiff:
Crissy Flake
Defendant:
Sonesta Walton Place LLC and Sonesta Chicago LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gutierrez et al v. Crown Equipment Corporation
as 1:2024cv12650
Plaintiff:
Ma De Lourdes Sanchez Vidales and Francisco Sotelo Gutierrez
Defendant:
Crown Equipment Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Wilson v. Walgreen Co.
as 1:2024cv12579
Plaintiff:
Marqueth Wilson
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Payne v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 1:2024cv12490
Plaintiff:
Feba Payne
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories and Abbott Laboratories, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Clifford v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv12494
Plaintiff:
Margaret Clifford
Defendant:
Chicago Pulaski CVS, LLC and CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
