US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 3,887
Morris v. Willis et al
as 1:2023cv05384
Petitioner:
Herbert Morris
Respondent:
Anthony Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Suarez v. Hinthorne et al
as 1:2023cv05354
Petitioner:
Jose Suarez
Respondent:
Hinthorne and Kwame Raoule
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dyson v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2023cv05277
Petitioner:
Stefannie Dyson
Respondent:
State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Northern v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv05170
Petitioner:
Shedrick Northern
Respondent:
Thomas Dart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
O'Connor v. Dart
as 1:2023cv05131
Petitioner:
Michael W. O'Connor
Respondent:
Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griffin v. Hinthorne et al
as 1:2023cv05181
Petitioner:
Keith Griffin
Respondent:
Cherryle Hinthorne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paige v. Case
as 1:2023cv05113
Petitioner:
Iviva Paige
Respondent:
Warden Jean Case
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griebahn v. Mendoza
as 1:2023cv05134
Plaintiff:
brittani griebahn
Defendant:
Margarita Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Federal Bureau of Investigations et al
as 1:2023cv04958
Petitioner:
Donald Wilson
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Investigations and Christopher A. Wray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
McMurtry v. Truitt
as 1:2023cv04807
Petitioner:
Cordellus McMurtry
Respondent:
Charles Truitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
